Sounds like he's sort of taking a page out of Fanni Willis' book, who uses "terrorism" all the time in an effort to crush gangs in Atlanta.
But legal jargon has its specifics for a reason.
"with intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population" is pretty clear. If lawmakers had meant "with intent to intimidate or coerce a *tiny portion* of the civilian population", such as CEOs, or even a *portion*, they would have said so.
Democrats pandering to Republican crime hysteria is not a good look.
I agree. Bragg still has Trump in the crosshairs now or in four years. They should sentence the guy and then defer the hearing to January 21, 2029, at 8 am. Tell Trump don't bring a change of clothes.
Bragg is short for "bullshit".
Sounds like he's sort of taking a page out of Fanni Willis' book, who uses "terrorism" all the time in an effort to crush gangs in Atlanta.
But legal jargon has its specifics for a reason.
"with intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population" is pretty clear. If lawmakers had meant "with intent to intimidate or coerce a *tiny portion* of the civilian population", such as CEOs, or even a *portion*, they would have said so.
Democrats pandering to Republican crime hysteria is not a good look.
I agree. Bragg still has Trump in the crosshairs now or in four years. They should sentence the guy and then defer the hearing to January 21, 2029, at 8 am. Tell Trump don't bring a change of clothes.
This murderer is not the hill I’m going to die on.